Do you have the plan to accept this challenge? Looking for a proven and quick method to pass this challenge MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam? If your answer is yes then you do not need to go anywhere. Just visit the PDF4Test and explore the top features of valid, updated, and real MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Dumps.

Most of the materials on the market do not have a free trial function. Even some of the physical books are sealed up and cannot be read before purchase. As a result, many students have bought materials that are not suitable for them and have wasted a lot of money. But MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance guide torrent will never have similar problems, not only because MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam torrent is strictly compiled by experts according to the syllabus, which are fully prepared for professional qualification examinations, but also because MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Guide Torrent provide you with free trial services. Before you purchase, you can log in to our website and download a free trial question bank to learn about MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance study tool.

>> MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Real Exam <<

MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update - New MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Mock Exam

We provide you with free update for one year for MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance study guide, that is to say, there no need for you to spend extra money on update version. The update version for MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam materials will be sent to your email automatically. In addition, MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam dumps are compiled by experienced experts who are quite familiar with the exam center, therefore the quality can be guaranteed. You can use the MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Exam Materials at ease. We have online and offline service, and if you have any questions for MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance training materials, don’t hesitate to consult us.

MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect - Level 1 MAINTENANCE Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

NEW QUESTION # 19
Refer to the exhibit.

Three business processes need to be implemented, and the implementations need to communicate with several different SaaS applications.
These processes are owned by separate (siloed) LOBs and are mainly independent of each other, but do share a few business entities. Each LOB has one development team and their own budget In this organizational context, what is the most effective approach to choose the API data models for the APIs that will implement these business processes with minimal redundancy of the data models?
A) Build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities

B) Build distinct data models for each API to follow established micro-services and Agile API-centric practices

C) Build all API data models using XML schema to drive consistency and reuse across the organization

D) Build one centralized Canonical Data Model (Enterprise Data Model) that unifies all the data types from all three business processes, ensuring the data model is consistent and non-redundant

• A. Option D
• B. Option A
• C. Option C
• D. Option B

Answer: B

Explanation:
Build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities.
*****************************************
>> The options w.r.t building API data models using XML schema/ Agile API-centric practices are irrelevant to the scenario given in the question. So these two are INVALID.
>> Building EDM (Enterprise Data Model) is not feasible or right fit for this scenario as the teams and LOBs work in silo and they all have different initiatives, budget etc.. Building EDM needs intensive coordination among all the team which evidently seems not possible in this scenario.
So, the right fit for this scenario is to build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities.

NEW QUESTION # 20
Which layer in the API-led connectivity focuses on unlocking key systems, legacy systems, data sources etc and exposes the functionality?

• A. Process Layer
• B. System Layer
• C. Experience Layer

Answer: B

Explanation:
System Layer

The APIs used in an API-led approach to connectivity fall into three categories:
System APIs - these usually access the core systems of record and provide a means of insulating the user from the complexity or any changes to the underlying systems. Once built, many users, can access data without any need to learn the underlying systems and can reuse these APIs in multiple projects.
Process APIs - These APIs interact with and shape data within a single system or across systems (breaking down data silos) and are created here without a dependence on the source systems from which that data originates, as well as the target channels through which that data is delivered.
Experience APIs - Experience APIs are the means by which data can be reconfigured so that it is most easily consumed by its intended audience, all from a common data source, rather than setting up separate point-to-point integrations for each channel. An Experience API is usually created with API-first design principles where the API is designed for the specific user experience in mind.

NEW QUESTION # 21
An organization has several APIs that accept JSON data over HTTP POST. The APIs are all publicly available and are associated with several mobile applications and web applications.
The organization does NOT want to use any authentication or compliance policies for these APIs, but at the same time, is worried that some bad actor could send payloads that could somehow compromise the applications or servers running the API implementations.
What out-of-the-box Anypoint Platform policy can address exposure to this threat?

• A. Apply a Header injection and removal policy that detects the malicious data before it is used
• B. Shut out bad actors by using HTTPS mutual authentication for all API invocations
• C. Apply a JSON threat protection policy to all APIs to detect potential threat vectors
• D. Apply an IP blacklist policy to all APIs; the blacklist will Include all bad actors

Answer: C

Explanation:
Apply a JSON threat protection policy to all APIs to detect potential threat vectors
*****************************************
>> Usually, if the APIs are designed and developed for specific consumers (known consumers/customers) then we would IP Whitelist the same to ensure that traffic only comes from them.
>> However, as this scenario states that the APIs are publicly available and being used by so many mobile and web applications, it is NOT possible to identify and blacklist all possible bad actors.
>> So, JSON threat protection policy is the best chance to prevent any bad JSON payloads from such bad actors.

NEW QUESTION # 22
A system API has a guaranteed SLA of 100 ms per request. The system API is deployed to a primary environment as well as to a disaster recovery (DR) environment, with different DNS names in each environment. An upstream process API invokes the system API and the main goal of this process API is to respond to client requests in the least possible time. In what order should the system APIs be invoked, and what changes should be made in order to speed up the response time for requests from the process API?

• A. Invoke ONLY the system API deployed to the primary environment, and add timeout and retry logic to avoid intermittent failures
• B. Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment, and if it fails, invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment
• C. In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment using a scatter-gather configured with a timeout, and then merge the responses
• D. In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment, and ONLY use the first response

Answer: D

Explanation:
In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment, and ONLY use the first response.
*****************************************
>> The API requirement in the given scenario is to respond in least possible time.
>> The option that is suggesting to first try the API in primary environment and then fallback to API in DR environment would result in successful response but NOT in least possible time. So, this is NOT a right choice of implementation for given requirement.
>> Another option that is suggesting to ONLY invoke API in primary environment and to add timeout and retries may also result in successful response upon retries but NOT in least possible time. So, this is also NOT a right choice of implementation for given requirement.
>> One more option that is suggesting to invoke API in primary environment and API in DR environment in parallel using Scatter-Gather would result in wrong API response as it would return merged results and moreover, Scatter-Gather does things in parallel which is true but still completes its scope only on finishing all routes inside it. So again, NOT a right choice of implementation for given requirement The Correct choice is to invoke the API in primary environment and the API in DR environment parallelly, and using ONLY the first response received from one of them.

NEW QUESTION # 23
Say, there is a legacy CRM system called CRM-Z which is offering below functions:
1. Customer creation
2. Amend details of an existing customer
3. Retrieve details of a customer
4. Suspend a customer

• A. Implement different system APIs named createCustomerInCRMZ, amendCustomerInCRMZ, retrieveCustomerFromCRMZ and suspendCustomerInCRMZ as they are modular and has seperation of concerns
• B. Implement a system API named customerManagement which has all the functionalities wrapped in it as various operations/resources
• C. Implement different system APIs named createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has seperation of concerns

Answer: C

Explanation:
Implement different system APIs named createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer
and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has seperation of concerns
*****************************************
>> It is quite normal to have a single API and different Verb + Resource combinations. However, this fits well for an Experience API or a Process API but not a best architecture style for System APIs. So, option with just one customerManagement API is not the best choice here.
>> The option with APIs in createCustomerInCRMZ format is next close choice w.r.t modularization and less maintenance but the naming of APIs is directly coupled with the legacy system. A better foreseen approach would be to name your APIs by abstracting the backend system names as it allows seamless replacement/migration of any backend system anytime. So, this is not the correct choice too.
>> createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer is the right approach and is the best fit compared to other options as they are both modular and same time got the names decoupled from backend system and it has covered all requirements a System API needs.

NEW QUESTION # 24
......

In order to meet the demand of all customers and protect your machines network security, our company can promise that our MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance test training guide have adopted technological and other necessary measures to ensure the security of personal information they collect, and prevent information leaks, damage or loss. In addition, the MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam dumps system from our company can help all customers ward off network intrusion and attacks prevent information leakage, protect user machines network security. If you choose our MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance study questions as your study tool, we can promise that we will try our best to enhance the safety guarantees and keep your information from revealing, and your privacy will be protected well. You can rest assured to buy the MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance exam dumps from our company.

MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update: https://www.pdf4test.com/MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance-dump-torrent.html

Mac OS X users can now open .MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update exam files using MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update Exam Simulator for Mac: PDF4Test MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update Note: MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update Simulator supports most types of questions, MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Real Exam Our online workers will solve your problem immediately after receiving your questions, It just takes your spare time to practice MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance test questions and review MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance practice test.

By Chris Adamson, Kevin Avila, Export Features and Formats, Mac OS X users (https://www.pdf4test.com/MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance-dump-torrent.html) can now open .MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect exam files using MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect Exam Simulator for Mac: PDF4Test Note: MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect Simulator supports most types of questions.

MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Real Exam | Efficient MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance Frenquent Update: MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect - Level 1 MAINTENANCE 100% Pass

Our online workers will solve your problem immediately after receiving your questions, It just takes your spare time to practice MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance test questions and review MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance practice test.

While, we will provide you a fast way to get success with the help of MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance pass guaranteed dumps, Above all, your success is ensured with 100% PDF4Test money back guarantee.