The vulnerability of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was exposed on Saturday, as Israel accused Hamas of not releasing a hostage, resulting in a stoppage of Gazan civilians moving back to their homes in the northern region.

The ceasefire arrangement was already a fragile understanding

With Israeli remarks frequently referring to it as a “framework” rather than a formal agreement.

Tensions intensified this week when 29-year-old Arbel Yehud, a civilian whom Israel claims should have been released on Saturday, was not included Albania Phone Number List among the four women who were set free. Israel subsequently did not permit Gazan civilians to return north past the Netzarim Corridor, which was scheduled to occur Saturday as per the ceasefire and hostage arrangement.

“It is preferable for Israel to speak less and allow the mediators to act more,” Baskin continued, urging Israel to “communicate to Qatar and Egypt that it is prepared to embrace the three-week deal that Hamas consented to in September.”

‘How will the US respond?’
Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari stated on Saturday that “Hamas didn’t fulfill the agreement in terms of its obligation to prioritize the return of civilians,” adding that “we will insist that Arbel Yehud return” alongside the other hostages.

Footage from CNN showed hundreds of displaced individuals fleeing in terror after the Israeli military opened fire on Saturday to prevent them from crossing into northern Gaza to return home. The Israeli military claimed it was “unaware of any harm” following its troops firing “warning shots in order to disperse” a crowd within Gaza.

Hamas asserted that Israel “continues to delay

The implementation of the terms of the ceasefire agreement and the prisoner exchange by keeping al-Rasheed Street closed and obstructing the return of displaced individuals moving from the south to the north.”

The Palestinian militant group further stated that Cell Phone Number Database it holds Israel “accountable for any delays in the execution of the agreement and the consequences that may arise during the remaining phases.”

There are uncertainties regarding how the United States under President Donald Trump would address the alleged violations by both parties.